On Son, 2015-07-05 at 21:04 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 07/05/2015 08:57 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > >> saving the "dynin.pd" abstraction, will break it. > [...] > > abstraction. I put [r _initbang] but it won't work. > > the trick is *not* to have a [r _initbang] in your patch. > the trick is to generate a message sent to the "_initbang" label. > this is a fragile hack, hence all my warnings; esp. the first warning > "do not save" is for real - and it's not because you will save the > dynamically generated objects, but because it will break the init logic. > > > and i would very much prefer if anybody who wants to use that trick > discovers themselves how it actually works (e.g. by studying the patch i > gave).
Despite your slight tone of discouragement to use such a hack, it's still a cool and smart hack. Thanks for sharing. Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list