My thought was that a wrapper object would be something that interested parties could put together on our/their own to get the language interface figured out, and then if it turned out that it worked well and people liked it then it could be integrated more tightly.
-s On Mon, Aug 17, 2015, at 03:47 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 08/17/2015 09:24 PM, Spencer Russell wrote: > > and maybe the object would be called [jl~] so you could instantiate [jl~ > > CoolNoise] and it would use your julia code to process blocks of audio. > > hopefully, there will be *no* wrapper object, and you can instantiate > [CoolNoise~] directly (or at least [CoolNoise], if ~ makes problems in > julia) > > gfmards > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
