that's the only difference I can think of, but you can also just switch between tables, not sure how important this feature is, seems is just something for possible fun anyway. cheers
2015-09-07 4:52 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]>: > On 2015-09-06 23:58, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > yeah, I was thinking about this versatility. I guess "better" isn't a > good > > word. I was thinking "more powerful" > > afaict, i would say it has a single feature that is trivial to implement > for [FIR~] as well... > > and if the table data itself is static¹, then it should be pretty easy > to get the desired behaviour with a wrapper abstraction around [FIR~] > that copies the data with an offset into an internal proxy table. > > > but well, if this is the only feature that makes [Buffir~] more powerful > than [FIR~], i will tell thomas to add it. > > fgasdrm > IOhannes > > ¹ that is: you don't continuously change the impulse response without > telling the filter object > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
