On 2015-09-08 11:13, Joe White wrote: > It might be a bit misleading to call this behaviour 'undefined'.
why? > > As Alexandre points out, control execution is defined by the order the > connections appear in the netlist and so have reliable results each time > the patch is run. > > It's not really the same problem you have in other languages where there is > a runtime ambiguity. that's only because we have a single runtime, that has a certain implementation which results in a given behaviour for an "undefined" one. this doesn't make it less "undefined" behaviour. > And is probably more an issue with the Pd environment UI than > the language specification. what *is* the Pd language then? i think that the language of Pd and it's UI are non-separable. gsdfmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
