@julian and @chris :) Thanks for the thought provoking message ;)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Chris McCormick <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Seb, > > On 08/09/15 14:47, s p wrote: > >> so I chose pragmatism over purity >> > > That makes a lot of sense. You thought carefully about the best > implementation with regards to the tradeoffs - my apologies for not seeing > that. > > > I only hope to persuade you that faithfulness to Pd's output is >> probably a feature that users will appreciate a lot. >> >> to conclude ... you don't need to persuade me of this :) I just think it >> is more important to have something you can use at all. But the future >> might be brighter, and maybe these two goals won't contradict each other >> any more. >> > > \o/ > > You're absolutely right that a WebPd that can run some patches without > 100% sample-level accuracy is better than one which can't run on many > devices at all, and your new approach sounds like a win on all platforms. > > Thanks for your hard work on WebPd. > > Cheers, > > Chris. > > -- > http://mccormick.cx/ > -- *Sébastien Piquemal* -----* @sebpiq* ----- http://github.com/sebpiq ----- http://funktion.fm
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
