really excited about the 0.5 version on the way :) thanks will definitely try this and let you know
cheers 2015-11-06 14:50 GMT-02:00 Shahrokh Yadegari <[email protected]>: > Hi Alexandre, (and all) > > Attached is a pre Version 0.5 expr~.d_fat compiled on OSX 10.9.5 with some > fixes. I have fixed a number of the bugs, which are listed on the attached > modified pd patch Alexandre sent me. I am still working on the others, but > I thought I send this intermediate version to you to test if you had the > time, before I pass the sources to Miller. > > I am not sure if I have picked the best way to fix the functions that were > supposed to receive one argument, but were listed as needing two, or vice > versa. My impetus was to fix and drop the erroneous version which would > break any patch that has used them in the wrong format. I think it is > better to break the patches and inform the author of the new change. Most > likely, the original use did not behave as it should have any way, and it > is better to fix the patch. > > I would be happy to hear from any experiences. > > best, > Shahrokh > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Shahrokh Yadegari <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Alexandre. I will be in touch soon with new objects. >> >> best, >> Shahrokh >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> sure, count me in for testing it, my pleasure ;) >>> >>> I'm on a mac os - yosemite and mavericks >>> >>> cheers >>> >>> 2015-09-08 21:22 GMT-03:00 Shahrokh Yadegari <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi Alexandre, >>>> >>>> I recall that I fixed this bug a while back so I am surprised that I >>>> see it again. >>>> >>>> In any case your email is timely as I just started looking at the bugs >>>> and hope to be submitting new sources soon. >>>> >>>> Would you care to be my alpha tester? If so, what environment are you >>>> on? (mac, linux, sorry I cannot deal with windows) >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> Shahrokh >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, as it seems, I just found that there's an issue with the way >>>>> [fexpr~] abbreviates the formulas and the way it behaves. >>>>> >>>>> If you use it like this [fexpr~ ($x + $x[-1] + $x[-2] + $x[-3]) * >>>>> 0.25] by supressing the outlet number, it won't check back on previous >>>>> block sample values. >>>>> >>>>> but if you do this [fexpr~ ($x1 + $x1[-1] + $x1[-2] + $x1[-3]) * 0.25] >>>>> it will! >>>>> >>>>> check attached patch >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, still seems like a bug to me one way or another that needs to >>>>> be fixed. And, as long as we're on the subject, how's the work on the >>>>> previous bug reports? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> 2015-09-08 1:47 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Shahrokh and Pd list >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been testing fexpr~ and it seems it won't get the previous >>>>>> samples from the previous block. >>>>>> >>>>>> For example, a simple mean filter like this: >>>>>> >>>>>> [fexpr~ ($x + $x[-1]) * 0.5] >>>>>> >>>>>> will not work for the first sample of the block, because it won't get >>>>>> the last sample from the previous block. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, I know that in practice it doesn't compromise much, it's just one >>>>>> sample, but in an 16 point average filter this becomes more of a concern. >>>>>> One way or another, even for just one sample, I consider this problematic >>>>>> and a bug, as it should always be able to address previous samples. >>>>>> >>>>>> Am I right? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > -- > Shahrokh Yadegari > Professor of Composition and Sound Design, > Theatre and Dance Department > University of California, San Diego > Director, Initiative for Digital Exploration of Arts and Science, (IDEAS) > California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technologies > (Calit2) > Email: [email protected] > Web: http://yadegari.org > Tel: (858) 822-4113 > Fax: (858) 534-1080 > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
