Judging from this commit, the new behavior is by design: 
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/commit/f0a3a0c621dacc1f617cf07b38d8dc563703d12e
 
<https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/commit/f0a3a0c621dacc1f617cf07b38d8dc563703d12e>

I seem to remember a long discussion where people *did not* like the clipping 
behavior. The rational was that the min/max values are meant for the UI min and 
max without enforcing direct clipping which you can do using [clip] explicitly.

Also judging form the commit, you can simply launch pd with an older compatibly 
mode.

--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
> On Dec 20, 2015, at 4:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> From: William Huston <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [PD] Regression Issue/Bug: Range-limited [hsl] responds differently 
> on out-of-range input
> Date: December 20, 2015 at 4:06:36 PM MST
> To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> 
> Regression Issue/Bug: 
> 
> Issue: Range-limited [hsl] responds differently on out-of-range input
> PD Versions: 0.43.4-extended vs 0.46.7
> OS: Raspbian 
> 
> The patch is:
> 
> [1000(
> |
> [hsl] # range limted 0-127 (default setting)
> |
> [nbx]  
> 
> Upon a bang to the message box, 
> 0.43.4-extended the answer is 127.
> On 0.46.7 the answer is 1000. 

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to