Well, newer patches with newer functionalities not working in older versions is how things go anyway, right? Vanilla 0-46 patches don't run in 0.45 and so on... there's no way around that I guess.
> the dual outlet layout with message left and > signal right is rather unusual. But I think it's also simpler and more straightforward than introducing flags, arguments and all. It might be unusual, but there are already some objects with similar design, I actually thought of that because of [sampstoms~] and [mstosamps~] - it'd be basically the same design. cheers 2015-12-22 19:48 GMT-02:00 katja <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If we're discussing [average~], how about my idea of having a second > right > > signal outlet as default? I think it's an easy and simple solution. Help > > file would explain how the left control outlet is for backwards > > compatibility. Done. > > Yes that would be an easy way to incorporate Fred Jan's signal average > output into the existing class. But note that both solutions, dual > mode and dual outlet, have a similar forward incompatibility effect. A > patch that uses the right signal outlet of a new version won't run > with an old average~ binary. So the pros and cons of both solutions > are comparable, with the small difference that the dual outlet layout > with message left and signal right is rather unusual. > > Katja >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
