really? can't see how much more relevantly efficient it'd be, and it kinda does check it already, hence the errors
cheers 2016-02-26 3:07 GMT-03:00 i go bananas <[email protected]>: > I would assume it's also slightly more efficient that pd doesn't have to > check the vector size when processing the s~ / r~ functions.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
