Le 28/02/2016 13:26, Alessio Degani via Pd-list a écrit :
On 27/02/2016 16:35, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 02/27/2016 12:05 PM, Alessio Degani via Pd-list wrote:
Is there a simple way to chek if a pd patch is made only using vanilla
object?
Hi IOhannes,
as in: install Pd-vanilla, start it with "-noprefs -verbose" and load
the patch?
Thank you for the answer.
That works. But how about a more direct "this patch uses the following libs/extern:
...".
Do you think that is feasible?
this is certainly possible, if someone spend time working on this.
but my concern is : why is this important?
i mean : if you don't care about conservation or portability, just start pd
loading a maximum of externals and use all of them.
but if you do care about conservation or portability, then load pd with only a minimal
set of externals, and "declare" the other only when you need them.
So, my advice is :
better than making a mess and try to fix it latter, it's easier to make things
clean in the 1st time.
cheers
c
Maybe in a future release of pd
Cheers
then see if any object couldn't create.
then check the Pd-console to see where it found the objects that it
could create, and check whether any of those are outside your patch path.
gfmsarI
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
a.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
