libpd does have a ringbuffer. My initial thought is to add a libpd layer where you do, in fact, pass in the instance and it either uses a lock or uses the ringbuffer for you. One reason why libpd does not lock by default, is that many of the language wrappers (C++, Java, etc) implement the locking t a higher level in a way that works best for that environment.
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> > On Apr 8, 2016, at 3:56 PM, Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, the Camomile stuff is interesting, it would be nice if that sort of > 'lock' do action 'unlock' thing was dealt with internally in the library, or > better yet, weren't required because you just pass an instance along and > operate on the instance because every method would have the instance passed > along with it :) > > Either way, looking forward to what comes of that! > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com > <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> wrote: > See Pierre’s details on how he built Camomille: > https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2016-04/020637.html > <https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2016-04/020637.html> > > Miller has included *preliminary* multi instance support and now we have some > good feedback on what still needs to be done. > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> > robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> >> On Apr 8, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com >> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> All quite cool.. >> >> what I'd _really_ love is thread safe muliti instance support in libpd with >> 'user data' entries in the callbacks for all the callback methods and an >> 'instance' pointer included in every appropriate library call. I figure it >> would be dead simple, once that is provided, to also support the existing >> libpd interface with 1 global instance.. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com >> <mailto:danomat...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Here’s the diffs as shown by GitHub: >> https://github.com/libpd/libpd/pull/97/files >> <https://github.com/libpd/libpd/pull/97/files> >> >> I’d do it, but I think the commits should be yours and not mine :) >> >> -------- >> Dan Wilcox >> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> >> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> >> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> >>> On Apr 8, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu >>> <mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> wrote: >>> >>> That would be cool - otherwise just point me at the diffs and I'll rework >>> them. I think they're rather self-contained, should be easy to hack in. >>> >>> cheers >>> M >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:57:16PM -0600, Dan Wilcox wrote: >>>> Although the branch is gone, the diffs are still there. If needed, I can >>>> manually re-add those changes & put them in a new branch. >>>> -------- >>>> Dan Wilcox >>>> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika >>>> <https://twitter.com/danomatika>> >>>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> <http://danomatika.com/ >>>> <http://danomatika.com/>> >>>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> <http://robotcowboy.com/ >>>> <http://robotcowboy.com/>> >>>>> On Apr 8, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu >>>>> <mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> No worries - that just means it's time for me to get back on it :) >>>>> >>>>> M >>>>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:46:32PM -0600, Dan Wilcox wrote: >>>>>> It’s not. We started looking into it but realized the was a mismatch >>>>>> between the vanilla mirror we were using as a submodule in libpd. I then >>>>>> switched libpd to use the main pure-data git upstream so it would be >>>>>> easier torack your changes directly. The PR went out of scope by then >>>>>> though and we forgot to revisit it. Sorry! >>>>>> >>>>>> -------- >>>>>> Dan Wilcox >>>>>> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/danomatika>> >>>>>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> <http://danomatika.com/ >>>>>> <http://danomatika.com/>> >>>>>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> <http://robotcowboy.com/ >>>>>> <http://robotcowboy.com/>> >>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2016, at 1:36 PM, Miller Puckette <m...@ucsd.edu >>>>>>> <mailto:m...@ucsd.edu>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought the GUI stuff (which I adapted from Kjetil's first cut at it) >>>>>>> was >>>>>>> already in libpd - if not I need to make a PR for it... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>> M >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:12:30PM -0600, Dan Wilcox wrote: >>>>>>>> Miller was also looking into adding the ability to launch the gui to >>>>>>>> libpd. There was a discussion somewhere, I can’t find it right now... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------- >>>>>>>> Dan Wilcox >>>>>>>> @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/danomatika>> >>>>>>>> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> <http://danomatika.com/ >>>>>>>> <http://danomatika.com/>> >>>>>>>> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> <http://robotcowboy.com/ >>>>>>>> <http://robotcowboy.com/>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2016, at 12:07 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at >>>>>>>>> <mailto:pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: Kjetil Matheussen <k.s.matheus...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@gmail.com> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@gmail.com>>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PD] pdlv2: generate lv2 plugins from pd patches >>>>>>>>> Date: April 8, 2016 at 11:08:29 AM MDT >>>>>>>>> To: Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com>>> >>>>>>>>> Cc: "pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>>" >>>>>>>>> <pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>>> >>>>>>>>> Reply-To: k.s.matheus...@notam02.no >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@notam02.no> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@notam02.no >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@notam02.no>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You might have to merge inn libd from upstream though. Don't know how >>>>>>>>> much work that is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Great, I'll look into that when I get some more time! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Kjetil Matheussen >>>>>>>>> <k.s.matheus...@gmail.com <mailto:k.s.matheus...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k.s.matheus...@gmail.com <mailto:k.s.matheus...@gmail.com>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Alex <x37v.a...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:x37v.a...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> hmm, that is interesting, is libpds simply part of the radium project >>>>>>>>> or is it something you distribute separately? I should look into >>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's my branch of libpd on github. You can ignore the libpds part, and >>>>>>>>> just use libpd as you do already, only that this version of libpd also >>>>>>>>> provide pd gui. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list >>>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>>>>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>>>>>> <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
