That would be great! That's outside of my expertise. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very nice! > > Do you mind if I make the randomization into an abstraction? > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika <https://twitter.com/danomatika> > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > On Apr 13, 2016, at 12:15 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > *From: *AP Vague <apva...@gmail.com> > *Subject: **[PD] waveform randomizer* > *Date: *April 13, 2016 at 12:14:51 PM MDT > *To: *"pd-l...@iem.at" <pd-l...@iem.at> > > > I wrote a patch to make interesting, pseudo-randomized waveforms in real > time as a way to add complexity and variation to drones. The patch > duplicates a table with randomization and uses [tabosc4~] as the final > oscillators to dac. This version cascades the duplication process; table b > is a copy of a, c is a copy of b, d is a copy of c. The results are pretty > interesting and I think the signals could work well with other > manipulations like filters. > > I'm afraid that this might have been the extreme longhand way to do this, > ha ha ha. It works fine for what I wanted but I thought there might be some > ideas on how to accomplish it in an easier way. I also just kind of wanted > to share it. > > Cheers. > <various waveforms.pd> > > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list