Hi Jerome,If you're saying that your patches used to work and they now break,
do file a bug about it. Others on the list have mentioned using
[declare] for this purpose-- I never have but it's a reasonable use case.
-Jonathan
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 7:30 PM, Jérôme Abel <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi list,
With the new [declare] behavior, I am a little confused (Pd.0.47). I've
read that putting [declare] in abstractions was not the "right" way, but
that what I've done. Shame.
In La Malinette (malinette.info), it is very useful to have an
abstraction named [include] which contains all relatives paths of all
abstractions folders. The goal is to be user friendly and not ask people
to add 6 paths in preferences ... And if I want to change a path, to
add a common feature for all patches, I have just to change it once, all
patches that have this abstraction are affected. And I want to add paths
to my patchs I have just to remember the name of [include] to add this
object and paths. These are benefits of having abstractions, like
object-oriented programming.
How can avoid to copy/paste 100 times a subpatch which contains
[declare] and all paths, in all my files ? Or may be there is a way to
add dynamically paths on all patches or current patches ? I can't see
[import] in Deken, may be it could be the right way to add this kind of
feature ? Is it downloable ?
Thanks,
Jerome
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
