Fred Jan, are you the author of Freeverb? I have built a "ducking reverb". It's a lot of fun to play with. I basically send note-on, note-off events and modulate the "wet" parameter, with a large room size.
Eg., a note-on will trigger Wet to go to Attack_Val (Usually a low Wet setting) in Attack_ms time. Then a note-off will trigger sending Wet to Release_Val (Usually a larger Wet setting) in Release_ms time. The only problem is, the message changes occur at control-rate, so I'm getting clicking. My question is, is there any advantage or difference in doing my Wet/Dry mixing internal to [Freeverb~]? ...as opposed setting freeverb to 0% dry and 100% wet and mixing externally? Of course I can get signal-rate mixing by using [line~] if I do this externally. Thanks, BH On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Fred Jan Kraan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I just completed the upload of an updated version 1.2.2 of freeverb~ to > puredata.info, and it is available via deken for the usual platforms. > > This version of Freeverb~ has three enhancements: > - placed the fix_denorm_nan_float() function is the signal path, > - added an alternate output that is closer to reality (in theory anyway), > - restyled the help patch and fixed the missing wav file. > > The github repository is at https://github.com/electrickery/pd-freeverb. > > I am looking forward to any comments regarding the alternate output > feature. > > > Greetings & have fun, > > Fred Jan > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- -- May you, and all beings be happy and free from suffering :) -- ancient Buddhist Prayer (Metta)
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
