> it work, but only if you find how an elephant can fit in a show box.

I understand :-). Thanks for your clarification! Probably saved me lots of 
wasted time.



> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2016 um 10:47 Uhr
> Von: "cyrille henry" <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [PD] LibPd on microcontroller
>
> hello,
> 
> Le 10/05/2016 00:37, Christof Ressi a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've read your mail, it actually was the key source of inspiration for 
> > trying out DSP on a microcontroller!
> >
> >> in fact, I did not recommend audio processing on hardware that did not 
> >> have support for float arithmetic.
> >> (only me or crazy nerd do that).
> >
> > I might be crazy as well then :-). I just wanna give it a try and see how 
> > far I'll get. I'm just excited about the low price of these modules, given 
> > their rather fast speed (and of course the integrated WiFi functionality!). 
> > I'm dreaming of tiny effect/sound modules that do a certain DSP job and 
> > receive/send messages via WiFi.
> >
> >
> >> a micro controller to use is for example the cortex M4. You  can find them 
> >> on the teensy hardware.
> >
> > Apparantly the Teensy 3.x uses the non-FPU version of the cortex M4:
> > https://forum.pjrc.com/threads/25909-Teensy3-1-and-FPU-%28Floating-Poitn-Unit%29
> crap.
> 
> >
> > Right now I can't see any advantage over the ESP8266. Also it costs about 4 
> > times as much!
> unless you are planning to produce 100 000 of this hardware, 20$ is nothing 
> regarding 1 month of work.
> I think you should start using the ESP8266 for the wifi and connect them to a 
> teensy and it's audio feature. Then, you'll be able to optimized the teensy 
> with you DSP code, and eventually put it in the ESP8266.
> 
> 
> >
> > Some guy made a benchmark test between ESP8266, Teensy 3.1 and Arduino Due:
> > http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?topic=337653.0
> >
> > The ESP8266 wins for floating points (and loses clearly for integers).
> floating point are about 10 time slower than int. You can't use them.
> 
> according to this benchmark, on the ESP826 chip, this line of code need 431ms:
>    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) a += a * a + 1000.7 / a - 40.4;
> 
> at 44.1KHz, you have only 22µs between audio sample.
> let's say that you can use 15µs for each sample, the rest for the wifi, audio 
> codec communication, etc.
> 
> 1 sample computation should then be faster than :
>    for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) a += a * a + 1000.7 / a - 40.4;
> (note the i<4) : this is not much for serious DSP stuff.
> 
> 
> using int on the ESP826, 1 sample computation should be faster than :
>    for (int i = 0; i < 37; i++) b += b * b + 1000 / b - 40;
> 
> on the OCS synth, i reduce the moog filter (same algo than the one i send to 
> this list) to:
> 
> 20 time the >> or << instruction
> 23 : addition or substraction
> 12 : 32 bit multiplication
> 6 : 64 bit multiplication
> 
> it is the most CPU hungry module.
> 
> 
> > Since you got DSP stuff working on an Arduino Due, it should also work on 
> > an ESP8266, I guess... But it's my task to find out.
> it work, but only if you find how an elephant can fit in a show box.
> 
> >
> > By the way, what kind of interface did you actually choose for the audio 
> > output and have you tried several methods?
> I know only 1 way to go : i2s.
> i use a WM8731.
> 
> cheers
> c
> 
> >
> > Thanks for sharing your experience!
> >
> > Christof
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Gesendet: Montag, 09. Mai 2016 um 17:39 Uhr
> >> Von: "cyrille henry" <[email protected]>
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Betreff: Re: [PD] LibPd on microcontroller
> >>
> >> hello,
> >>
> >> I recently send a mail in this list describing my experience of audio 
> >> synthesis on microcontroler, but i did not use libpd.
> >>
> >> i did not recommend libpd for microcontrolers.
> >>
> >> in fact, I did not recommend audio processing on hardware that did not 
> >> have support for float arithmetic.
> >> (only me or crazy nerd do that).
> >>
> >> a micro controller to use is for example the cortex M4. You  can find them 
> >> on the teensy hardware.
> >> teensy also provide a audio synthesis library, and is supported by arduino 
> >> IDE.
> >>
> >> You can also have a look at the heavy compiler if you want to embedded a 
> >> pd patch.
> >>
> >> Cyrille
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 09/05/2016 17:01, Christof Ressi a écrit :
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> has anyone experience in using LibPd on a microcontroller?
> >>> I wanna try to run some rather basic DSP code on this guy here:
> >>> https://www.olimex.com/Products/IoT/MOD-WIFI-ESP8266-DEV/open-source-hardware
> >>> There are some existing Arduino/C++ frameworks and I thought I could 
> >>> either write my own small DSP library in C++ or use LibPd.
> >>>
> >>> I understood that LibPd is completely independed of audio drivers and 
> >>> external libraries and since it's plain C code it should work on 
> >>> everything that can run code. However, I have only encountered LibPd in 
> >>> the context of other applications (processing, openFrameworks) and mobile 
> >>> devices so far. Do you think it could work on an ESP8266? I'm also a bit 
> >>> concerned about efficiency, as computation power is rather limited:
> >>>
> >>> "ESP8266EX is embedded with Tensilica L106 32-bit micro controller (MCU), 
> >>> which features extra low
> >>> power  consumption  and  16-bit  RSIC. The  CPU  clock  speed  is  80MHz. 
> >>>  It  can  also  reach  a  maximum
> >>> value  of  160MHz.  Real  Time  Operation  System  (RTOS)  is  enabled.  
> >>> Currently,  only  20%  of  MIPS  has
> >>> been  occupied  by  the  WiFi  stack,  the  rest  can  all  be  used  for 
> >>>  user  application  programming  and
> >>> development."
> >>>
> >>> Christof
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> [email protected] mailing list
> >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> >>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> [email protected] mailing list
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > [email protected] mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to