> I'm just curious: If I implemented a way to close-source Pure Data patches, would I violate the GPL if I ship:
> * Pd as a binary > * the GPL'd externals as binary with their source code and License > * my closed-source patch That has to be a GPL violation. On the other hand:* proprietary Pd binary* place for user to enter url of remote repository of packages* Deken exists This can't possibly be a GPL violation. I'm not advocating for building proprietary binaries, but this is such a trivial workaround it'd be silly not to mention it. -Jonathan
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
