However, I was also asked that - so I think I should add something to the example to show it :)
M On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:25:16PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2016-05-11 16:18, Liam Goodacre wrote: > > Would it be possible to access [clone]'s unique instance number from within > > the patch, a bit like a creation argument? This could be used to achieve > > differentiation between the abstractions, ie. if the abstraction contains > > "tabread4~ $-1.array" and the $-1 is replaced with the instance number, > > then each instance could read a different file. Of course there are other > > ways of doing this, but it would be neat to do it with clone, and I'm > > wondering if there's a way. > > > isn't this what $1 is already doing in clone's instances? > > > fgasdmr > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
