hello, how are you doing cpu load measurement?
I find it very hard to do reliable measurement of cpu load nowadays, since computer have a variable cpu speed depending on load. For exemple, pd CPU load can be at 75%, with CPU frequency at 800MHz. When increasing the patch complexities, the CPU frequency increase, and the apparent load reported by pd decrease. On linux, you can bloc the processor to a fixed frequency, and then make reliable load measurement. But i don't know how to do than on OSX. Did you find a way? otherwise, your measurement are useless. cheers c Le 27/06/2016 10:44, [email protected] a écrit :
Do you want to share your patch? I could test it on my machine with 0.46 and 0.47 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Gesendet: Sonntag, 26 Juni 2016 um 13:27:23 Uhr Von: "Dario Sanfilippo" <[email protected]> An: pd-list <[email protected]> Betreff: [PD] Experiencing a higher CPU load with 0.47-0 and 0.47-1. Hi, list. I'm loading the same patch with 0.46-7, 0.47-0 and 0.47-1 - all 64bit. The last two have a significantly higher CPU load. I'm on OSX 10.11.5. Has any of you experienced anything similar? I haven't changed my [vd~] objects into [delread4~], are they calling the same piece of code? The patch is almost exclusively using signal objects, have some of these been modified in 0.47-0 and 0.47-1? Thanks for your help. Dario _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
