On 2016-07-13 10:12, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > On 2016-07-12 09:41, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> yes. that's the microsoft way to ship dependencies. > > Lets keep Microsoft out of this, this is a Pd and Pd externals issue.
no. we can leave out my rant, but shipping dependencies multiple times *is* the w32 way, and i do think we should follow that path. the alternative - installing 3rd party dependencies to %pd%\bin or even to %System% - is a very good way to break your system. > How we update all w32 Deken pkgs? this probably sounds a bit obvious: we identify the broken packages, then identify the missing dlls for each. then we repack the packages with the libraries included, and upload them) i can do the second part (repackaging, re-uploading), if someone wades through the first part (identification of missing parts) and provides the result in a computer-readable form. (there are probably ways to automate the first part using DependencyWalker of similar, but i don't know them) fgmasdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
