> The entire subpatch, which in principle can be used to wrap [fft~].> My plan
> is to have a common way of wrapping these objects with threads so that
> I do not have to re-write all of them.
Would this potentially benefit any subpatch, or just ones that have a
substantially larger block size than the parent patch?
> Giulio
From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com>
To: Giulio Moro <giuliom...@yahoo.it>; Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at>
Sent: Saturday, 1 October 2016, 1:43
Subject: Re: [PD] Threading in Pd/libpd
> Yes, that's the plan, by default I'd set it to the number of samples
> corresponding to the step determined by the specified overlap.
What exactly gets computed in the separate thread? Is it only the revised
[fft~] object? Or is it the entire subpatch?
-Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
