On Oct 6, 2016, at 3:49 AM, [email protected] wrote:

1) External developers who want to support purr-data (pd-l2ork) can #ifdef 
their guis.2) For those who don't want to learn a new toolkit, and for 
unmaintained libraries, it'll be up to purr-data developers.
Until we have good documentation for integrating pd+nwjs, the first option may 
only work well for people who have a toe in both pools. I think that's me for 
cyclone, and I'll be glad to support purr-data directly in the new cyclone 
library as soon as I have a good chunk of time to do it, and some time to work 
out the kinks with Jonathan.

> I know I’ve mentioned it before, but I wish there was a middle ground where 
> the GUI calls were abstracted enough to make these kinds of version/fork 
> specific approaches unnecessary.
https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data#gui-messaging-specification
-Jonathan
   
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to