Good point. :-) so let's put it this way: the difference in cpu cost is neglectible for well designed patches. Again, i might be wrong.
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2016 um 23:54 Uhr > Von: "IOhannes m zmölnig" <zmoel...@iem.at> > An: pd-list@lists.iem.at > Betreff: Re: [PD] efficient approximation of trig functions for hi pass > formula (was: could vanilla borrow iemlib's hi pass filter recipe?) > > On 10/19/2016 11:40 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: > > I guess, you can't change the cutoff frequency so often that the CPU cost > > will actually matter. But maybe I'm wrong... > > well, the perform routing will be called *at most* for each block (which > can be 1 sample when running with [block~ 1]) > > the cutoff frequency will be changed whenever you send a message, which > can be much ... more often, [until] somebody fixes your patch. > > fmar > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
