my head is completely fried now. i think this is the fourth thing i tried, and now i got it to work. ouch. looks like a total shambles. but it works. http://imgur.com/a/ZhWWS
not sure i can look at that image i linked, and what you suggested, and make sense of it.. gotta crash. i guess there's a better way of doing this shambles? On 10 January 2017 at 23:54, Claude Heiland-Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/01/17 21:31, Esa Ruoho wrote: > > Any ideas how to go about it? > > The [value] object will likely help you, along with [select] and > [trigger] (which can be abbreviated to [v], [sel] and [t]). Remember to > use $0 in the name of the [v], if you want multiple instances of your > patch or abstraction to be independent. > > A pattern you might find useful is: > > control message > | > [t b a] > | | > [value x] | > | | > some process > | > [t b f] > | / > [value x] > | > updated value > > > Claude > -- > https://mathr.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > -- --- http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com // +358403703659 // skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage: [email protected] //
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
