On 2017-02-06 14:07, Peter P. wrote: >> this is a left-over from the days of the pipe-dreams of co-existing >> pd-vanilla and pd-extended Debian packages. > And could be consolidated maybe even?
well, i don't see any harm in being open to multiple (binary compatible) implementations. i don't see any important argument for conosolidating, so i won't do it. >> today's forks (pd-l2ork, purrdata) actively reject the notion of binary >> compatibility (so they must not look for externals in /usr/lib/pd/extra) > "must not" or "do not have to"? "binary incompatibility" doesn't necessarily mean "won't load". it's more along the lines: will burn your computer and vote for trump. amsdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
