> i keep forgetting of abominations like running a 32-bit Pd on a 64-bit OS.
Actually, the average Windows user will have more 32-bit apps than 64-bit apps running on their 64-bit OS ;-). And most Pd users on 64-bit Windows will have a 32-bit Pd because Miller doesn't offer 64-bit binaries yet and building from source is still impossible (at least with MinGW). > decent OSs should be able to manage more than a total 4GB of RAM even > when the entire OS is 32bit (a single application will not be able to > address more than 2^32 bytes though; but it should get you closer to > really having 4GB, rather than 2GB) on 32-bit Windows you usually get 2 GB per process - or 3 GB with some tricks*. on 64-bit Windows it's 2 GB for 32-bit processes unless you compile with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE set, then you get 4 GB. here are the boring details: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778(VS.85).aspx?ranMID=24542&ranEAID=TnL5HPStwNw&ranSiteID=TnL5HPStwNw-Z6NjEgcaJn8pbbYAema89g&tduid=(94e0b4bf83daa242de97c8bfb531e5d9)(256380)(2459594)(TnL5HPStwNw-Z6NjEgcaJn8pbbYAema89g)() I actually I didn't know about IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE until now. Miller could actually use it in his 32-bit Windows builds, which currently only allow 2 GB**. It won't do any harm on 32-bit systems and doubles the available memory on 64-bit systems. > fun fact: on linux, you can use 64bit Pd for >10 years with virtually > all external libraries working. :-o. time to finally get my dual boot. I weren't so lazy... Christof * IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE set + 4GT enabled (risky) ** I tested this with latest vanilla 32-bit binaries on Windows 7 64-bit (with 16 GB of RAM installed). I get a warning when I try to exceed 2 GB. > Gesendet: Montag, 27. Februar 2017 um 22:58 Uhr > Von: "IOhannes m zmölnig" <zmoel...@iem.at> > An: pd-list@lists.iem.at > Betreff: Re: [PD] soundfiler alternative? > > On 02/27/2017 10:45 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: > >> well, [table] stores the samples as floating point (taking 4 bytes per > >> sample; and 8 byte on 64bit systems), > > It depends on your Pd (32-bit or 64-bit), not on the system. > > well yes, true. > i keep forgetting of abominations like running a 32-bit Pd on a 64-bit OS. > > > > >> however, there is a simple solution at hand: get youself plenty of RAM > >> and pre-load everything into tables. > >> 32GB cost about 250,-€ and will allow you to load approx. 24h of raw > >> audio, which is probably enough. > > Unfortunately, this is only true for 64-bit processes. A single 32-bit > > process can't handle more than 2^32 bytes (~4 GB). In reality, it's even > > less, usually 2 GB, which is a bit more than 1,5 hours of stereo audio > > @44100 Hz. Pd will give you a warning when you try to exceed this limit > > ("pd: resizebytes() failed - out of memory"). > > how much RAM does that machine have? > decent OSs should be able to manage more than a total 4GB of RAM even > when the entire OS is 32bit (a single application will not be able to > address more than 2^32 bytes though; but it should get you closer to > really having 4GB, rather than 2GB) > > but yes, in order to make use of 32GB of memory you need a native 64bit > application (running on a 64bit OS). > > fun fact: on linux, you can use 64bit Pd for >10 years with virtually > all external libraries working. > > gmsr > IOhannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
