You know about [array get] and [array set], do you? Roman
On Fre, 2017-04-21 at 15:02 +0000, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote: > compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy > > _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ > > For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, > go to http://sharktracks.co.uk > > > On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly <morph_2...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > > > Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or > the same size as the source! > > _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ > > For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, > go to http://sharktracks.co.uk > > > On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists. > iem.at> wrote: > > > I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. > It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is > smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My > source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small > - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My > rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has > been broken for a while. > > I fixed it. Enclosed. > Ed > > _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ > > For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, > go to http://sharktracks.co.uk > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis > tinfo/pd-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis > tinfo/pd-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
