i just discovered, that a [loadbang] can trigger even if Pd is started with "-noloadbang".
1.) create an abstraction myloadbang.pd [loadbang] | [print $0-loadbanged] 2.) create a patch that contains (only) a [myloadbang] object, save it as "myloadbang-test.pd" 3.) start Pd with "pd -noloadbang myloadbang-test.pd" 3a.) observe that the loadbang is suppressed (as there is no "1004-loadbanged: bang" printout) 4.) in the myloadbang-test.pd patch, create a new instance of [myloadbang]. 4a) observe that the instance does get loadbanged (the Pd-console shows "1005-loadbanged: bang") is this intended behaviour? (I don't have a string opinion either way; but i wonder...). gfmasdr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
