> On 2 Jul 2017, at 23:38, Lucas Cordiviola <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >yes, but the array solution is more robust since it takes pitch into account 
> >as well, so it works with multiple note ons and offs for the same note (and 
> >a mismatch of those).
> 
> ?
> we are only counting how many are pressed. 
> Your patch does not tell anything about pitch.
well my array based approach sets a boolean value for each pitch, while the 
other approach just counts note ons and offs regardless of pitch.
hence in the array solution two note ons of the same pitch will still result in 
a 1 and in the other approach in a 2.
> 
> >i think it is not totally clear if a note off for a given pitch should mute 
> >all the notes sounding at that pitch. (can there sound more then one note on 
> >the same pitch on the same instrument?) 
> 
> Can you put 2 different values on the same array/table index at the same time?
no, that is exactly why i use it :-)
> 
> For midi-channel 1, note 64, there is *only* one velocity possible, not more 
> than one.
yeah but you can send two note ons 64 after each other, and then one note off 
64, what should happen? (for example if you merge two midi-streams)
> 
> 
> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
> 
> 
> From: Simon Iten <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2017 8:53 PM
> To: Lucas Cordiviola
> Cc: Cyrille Henry; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PD] legato portamento
>  
> yes, but the array solution is more robust since it takes pitch into account 
> as well, so it works with multiple note ons and offs for the same note (and a 
> mismatch of those).
> i think it is not totally clear if a note off for a given pitch should mute 
> all the notes sounding at that pitch. (can there sound more then one note on 
> the same pitch on the same instrument?)
> 
> > On 2 Jul 2017, at 22:21, Lucas Cordiviola <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > <simon-notes-minimal.pd>

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to