That's just the question - is it worth keeping an old bug available for compatibility? In this case, perhaps yes - although you'd have to explicitly set a compatibility flag in Pd to get eh old behavior.
(incidentally teh old behavior was machine-dependent - this complicates it even further :) On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 01:41:22PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > 2017-07-16 13:03 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <[email protected] > >: > > > Hi Miller, > > > > Should there be a compatibility path for the following bugfix: > > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/ > > fc1dd9b0d93e9b039719103155b5772f20762c7e/ > > > > Looks like the old behavior was there for awhile. > > > > hmm, more than a "behaviour", seems to me like a wrong mathematical output, > a bug. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
