now, since we're talking about "Dejas Vu", I'm also having a Deja Vu of my own... it's not the first time I complain things look different, but then someone ends up saying I needed to do something else in order to test it... as it happened in this discussion a few months ago https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/42
and I did ask if the idea is to be compatible to old extended (and purr data), and I seem to have been able to test, at one point, that it actually did and I couldn't be happier. But I also thought that, at this point, compiling from that branch would give me that result out of the box. So, did I miss something or not? cheers 2017-07-21 20:36 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>: > So, i just built from https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/tree/dejavu > and tested here on my mac. It looks good alright, seems to render better > and stuff, but it isn't backwards compatible, seems to require more real > estate for texts and all (object size and the like) - see attachment. > > So it doesn't really render the same as in purr data, like you say. That > actually looks the same as the current pd state, as well as old pd extended. > > As much as I like the idea of having a new cross platform bahaviour for > pd, I was hoping it'd be the same as purr data and all... also that I > wouldn't have to reformat over 300 help patches I'm working on, plus my > tutorials which is quite numerous as well - not to mentio regular > patches/abstractions. > > cheers > > > > 2017-07-21 18:48 GMT-03:00 Lucas Cordiviola <[email protected]>: > >> @IOhannes >> >> Here Dan is saying he is becoming to like the font metrics thing: >> >> https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2017-07/119495.html >> >> >> >> >> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Pd-list <[email protected]> on behalf of Lucas >> Cordiviola <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 7:24 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.48-0test1 released >> >> >> >> @IOhannes: >> >> *>it seems that i remember dan (or was it miller) pointing to the newly* >> >> *introduced zoom feature which complicates things a bit more. and dynamic* >> >> *font managing. and what not. (probably check the archives)* >> >> *the conclusion for me is: there *are* downsides.* >> >> >> The zoom feature will work with the correct doubles from pdx metrics, >> this are the actual doubles of vanilla: >> >> set font_zoom2_metrics { >> 12 20 >> 14 26 >> 18 32 >> 20 42 >> 30 50 >> 50 90 >> } >> >> Does *downside* to you is having a little more white space? >> >> Pdx font metrics wont break vanilla patches. >> >> See: >> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/wiki/Crossplatform-fo >> nt-metrics-%26-comparisons >> >> >> >> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Pd-list <[email protected]> on behalf of IOhannes m >> zmoelnig <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 7:44 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.48-0test1 released >> >> On 2017-07-21 04:50, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: >> > >> > I don't see any downside on pdx font metrics. >> > >> >> it seems that i remember dan (or was it miller) pointing to the newly >> introduced zoom feature which complicates things a bit more. and dynamic >> font managing. and what not. (probably check the archives) >> the conclusion for me is: there *are* downsides. >> >> >> On 2017-07-21 04:50, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: >> > This is a major change to everybody, >> >> certainly not. >> >> gmasdr >> IOhannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/li >> stinfo/pd-list >> >> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
