On 08/29/2017 10:08 AM, oliver wrote: > > > hi, two questions about this: > > 1.) how does this memory leak show in a patch that has a lot of net > traffic (i.e. sends many numbers fast to sync video to a timecode) ?
the memory leak is about leaking connections, so it is only relevant if you do *lots* of (re)connects. the actual transmitted data does not leak. > 2.) would it be better to use "iemnet" objects instead ? as the author of iemnet, i'd say "of course". as a Pd-purist, i'd say it's *far* better to to fix the *vanilla* objects. at least, with Pd-0.48 you can use iemnet together with fudiparse/fudiformat to build a fully compliant wrapper for netsend/netreceive, so you can have a temporary workaround until the core objects are fixed. btw, the error in netsend has been fixed in the update/0.48-0 branch, but netreceive still leaks some memory on each reconnection... gamrds IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
