On 08/29/2017 08:02 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > cool, but I think that would be a Pd issue, anyway, huh? An object > shouldn't stop working, as I see it
i'd rather say that tof was making assumptions about private implementation details of Pd and was exploiting them. (pretty much all GUI objects do that) in which case there are two ways to implement your proposal: - stop all development of Pd and only fix bugs. OR - continue development and support all (broken) APIs ever exposed. i figure from the feature requests you posted in the past, that the first option is not viable for you. the second option has a well known predecessor: Microsoft Windows. i'm pretty sure we do not want to go down *that* road (leaving aside financial feasibility: you probably need to employ coders to keep that up and running) gmadsr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
