Agreed on all fronts. The reason i'm keen on having a master clock that's audio driven is because i also want to sync my step sequencer to looping audio buffers, playback with a phasor~
I see that this could also be done with with metro (i.e. trigger playback of the audio file) On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Matt Davey <[email protected]> wrote: > performance, as in CPU performance? For sure you're gonna get much > greater performance using just messages. > > It's also MUCH simpler to sequence with a [metro] and messages, and very > easy to do interesting things to a sequence. > > compare that to something like this, in the link claude just shared: > > https://archive.bleu255.com/0xA/files/2016/04/010_shuffle.png > > what a mess! > > > I see what you mean about having a single master clock, but why not just > have a single master clock that's based on [metro] and a counter? You can > use that clock to trigger sub-clocks to whatever resolution you like, right > down to subsample accuracy. > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
