> So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a > faster mac > or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the > GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been > having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData? Not sure at whom that is directed, but I'm definitely not saying that.
Post a trivial example patch on the tracker and I'll have a look and see if I can fix it: https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/issues -Jonathan On 3 October 2017 at 20:28, Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com> wrote: 2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com>: I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates the current selection inside an abstraction. This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My mind is tricking me into believing I even tried it myself and saw that it worked in Purr Data. How crazy am I? cheers ______________________________ _________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list -- http://linkedin.com/in/esaruoho // http://twitter.com/esaruoho // http://lackluster.bandcamp.com //+358403703659 // http://lackluster.org // skype:esajuhaniruoho // iMessage esaru...@gmail.com //http://esaruoho.tumblr.com // http://deposit4se.tumblr.com // http://facebook.com/LacklusterOfficial //
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
