sorry to be dense..how´s that supposed to work? trying to recreate the ascii patch doesn´t yield aynthing here except 0
:-( hans > Am 15.10.2017 um 19:59 schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>: > > On 10/14/2017 10:51 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >> no, I mean Pd's "global" sample rate, not an audio file's rate > > well, my answer was specifically about the "global" sample rate, not > about audio files. > > if you are running Pd at 44.1kHz, then the following prints out "44100", > even if run in an up- or downsampled subpatch: > > ~~~ > [write -nframes 0 . foo( > | > [soundfiler] > [t f] > [print] > ~~~ > > which i think is what you asked for. > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
