well, yes :-) i’m used to files that end with a suffix .whatever the .whatever usually designates the filetype. so using a . before the filetype suffix is much harder to read for me and totally uncommon.
while this is not an issue within pd itself it is still worth considering i think. > On 17 Oct 2017, at 22:00, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 2017-10-17 17:45 GMT-02:00 Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > Well, here's what I have, an object named [allpass.rev~] > > As a practical matter, I still don't understand why you are trying > to use "." instead of "_". > > not trying anymore, I succeeded, so it seems. > > and I already said it's just a matter of personal preference, not much else > to add > > I also see this pattern here and there, so I'm not coming up with this, would > anyone have something against using "."? > > cheers > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
