On Don, 2017-10-19 at 17:23 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 10/19/2017 03:20 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > > > Well, I guess this is now turning into a request to bring such > > functionalities to vanilla. My point being that it'd be of vital > > importance > > if we want Pd Vanilla to have any real functionality of providing > > ways to > > program powerful external abstractions. > > i'm pretty tired of issues being re-raised over more than a decade.
Though I mostly agree with you, I disagree with the notion that raising the same thing several times is necessarily a bad thing. I'm living in a country where the people directly vote about some decisions. We would live in medieval times still - so to speak - if we hadn't voted about the same thing many times. 10 years later, the (Pd-) world might have changed a bit and suddenly implementing [initbang] in Pd-vanilla is considered nice and pretty.. How can you know? > (it obviously show that there is interest in the problem. but we now > do > have a solution Good. :-) > apart from that, iemguts is licensed under the GPL-2+. > everybody is free to use it under this license (but note, that e.g. > ELSE > is currently not compatible with GPL) It seems as if the _license_ forces sane behavior. GPL forever! Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
