Oh wow, thanks Dan! I didn't think it would be this easy. I hope the pull request gets accepted. "No method for 'set' " is the error message I get in 0.47, which seems harmless enough.
BTW, I've been meaning to say this for a while: the new readme file is great. It's much more helpful than before, and I really appreciate the work you put into it (and so many other things). ________________________________ From: Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> Sent: 29 October 2017 10:20 To: Liam Goodacre Cc: Pd-List Subject: Re: [PD] A "set" method for [value] Happy Halloween: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241 Since [value] only works with floats (and not symbols), I think a set message shouldn't break anything and (helpfully) result in "got symbol but expected float" errors in earlier versions of Pd as opposed to non connections with a missing second inlet. On Oct 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I was thinking that it could be done through the main inlet using a "set" message, just like the tabread and tabwrite objects. But a second inlet might be good also. What could go wrong? -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika<http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com<http://danomatika.com> robotcowboy.com<http://robotcowboy.com>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
