On Mit, 2018-01-31 at 09:32 +0100, katja wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > I'm a bit unsure about the -nosleep option. What is it supposed to > > do? > > I thought it would make Pd burn as many CPU cycles as it can get. > > And > > your mail from 2015 suggests a similar behavior. I run it like > > this: > > > > pd -noprefs -nosleep -rt -jack -channels 2 > > > > and it still only runs at 3% of a core with the [adc~]-[dac~] > > patch. > > This is with Pd-0.48-1 (git 3417d9036). > When running pd Pd-0.48-1 with option -nosleep on my core2 machine, > CPU load is 100% on one (switching) core. Seems like the -nosleep > option does not have the same effect on all hardware.
I just figured out now that -nosleep indeed works, also on my hardware. But it does _not_ when using -jack backend. Can anyone confirm? > That may be an indicator of the underlying problem causing audio drop > out. Definitely. I wonder how Pd is different from other jack clients. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
