* Federico Camara Halac <camaraf...@gmail.com> [2018-02-23 18:43]: > > So you should first run "killall pd" (and even killall -9 pd when it's > > stuck), before running you command. > > > > Thanks! You are correct that a pd process with the netreceive is still > running. > (fun fact, for me at least: When running it from a new terminal, the new > netsend started printing on the previous terminal) > > Now I tried it on a different mac. I was on macOS 10.9, now on 10.11.6 > (same pd) > > On first run, connection is established and patch works as expected, which > is puzzling. > > On second run (after effectively running killall pd, or killall -9 pd): > > connecting stream socket: Connection refused (61)
Fede, can you confirm that no other Pd instance is running before you start your second instance? I remember issues with the operating system leaving a port open and thus reserving it for a longer while than the application (Pd in this case) requests it. You could try to use a patch with a different port number when you start it the second time and see if that works. _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list