I noticed this issue ca. one year ago when I started working on a complex 
project with data structures which involved dynamically adding/deleting objects 
to/from a canvas. I even submitted a bug report: 
https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/bugs/1282/

since I've recently started doing a couple a PRs, this is something I want to 
investigate too.

to explain the problem quickly:

a glist (list of graphical objects) is internally implemented as a linked list. 
usually, a big advantage of a linked lists is that adding/deleting elements 
won't touch other elements (especially doesn't move them in memory, like it can 
happen with dynamically sized arrays). I don't see why adding/deleting 
graphical objects should invalidate any gpointers - apart from those which 
pointed to the deleted element(s).

I guess it's meant as a means to keep Pd pointers safe - but what situation 
does it try it prevent?
and why are gpointers also invalidated if you add/delete "normal" text objects 
which are not scalars (and so no gpointer could possibly point to it)?

any pointers (no pun intended) to the reasons behind this desigin decision are 
highly appreciated :-)



> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2018 um 12:17 Uhr
> Von: Fede <camaraf...@gmail.com>
> An: pd-list@lists.iem.at
> Betreff: [PD] stale pointers after object creation (was Re: pix_data issue)
>
> Ok, so it is a combination of editing the canvas and pointer memory
> 
> i don’t think it has to do with saving.
> also, i don’t think it would relate to the previous pix_data pointer issue
> 
> Here’s a patch
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:24 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote:
> 
> > On 02/28/2018 10:53 AM, Fede Camara Halac wrote:
> >> Would saving (cmd+s) make pix_data forget a pointer, as in [text] or 
> >> [array] objects when using pointers?
> > 
> > that sounds very fishy to.
> > do you have a patch that exposes the forget-on-save behaviour of [array]
> > or [text]?
> > 
> > gfmdasr
> > IOhannes
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to