I expect that using [readsf~] in a re-blocked and up-sampled patch is usefull to have the same played back file but trying to avoid glitches.
2018-03-04 21:18 GMT+01:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]>: > On 03/04/2018 06:39 PM, Marco Matteo Markidis wrote: > > Dear Miller, > > > > thank you for your patch. Anyway, until here I have been arrived. The > point > > is that if you connect this [readsf~] to a [dac~] in the parent window it > > sounds 64-times higher and shorter. There is something that I am missing? > > what do you expect? > none of Pd's soundfile reading/writing objects do any resampling. > > so if you play back a 22.05kHz soundfile in a patch running on 44.1kHz > it will be played back at double speed (with double pitch and halt the > duration). > > gfmadsr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > > -- Ho cambiato l'indirizzo email in [email protected] . Se non è un problema, scrivimi a questo nuovo indirizzo email. I changed my email address in [email protected] . If it is ok for you, please write me to this new email address.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
