On 03/06/2018 07:23 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Now, in my defense, I can say there could be not so pointless features > here. Like, I have a nice GUI abstraction, and people may think it's an > external and that they can change its properties, but it's not, so it'd be > nice to suppress the properties option, I think. And I don't think it's > nice to have a useless and pointless canvas properties for a GUI > abstraction. Now, if this were an external, it would just not show any > properties, because there isn't one, but when it comes to abstractions, we > do not have a choice... Moreover, it wouldn't add any dependency, as this > would be for my external library, and the abstraction already has > dependencies to other externals in the library.
you know, with [propertybang] your GUI abstraction would (well: could) have *real* properties. not just the generic ones every abstraction has, but properties like GUI externals. which i think is rather more interesting than having no properties menu. fgadsmr IOhannes
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pdemail@example.com mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list