3) is a known issue. I already made a PR to fix it (https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/310)
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. März 2018 um 17:23 Uhr > Von: Max <[email protected]> > An: "[email protected] List" <[email protected]> > Betreff: [PD] [clone] observations > > Hi list, Miller. > > A little late to the game I started to use [clone]. Some observations: > > 1. If the abstraction name already exists as an external, it fails to > instantiate. Meaning you can't do [clone spigot 10] or [clone disk 4]. I > think this is a bug, as the local abstraction should override any built > in objects or externals. > > 2. In the helpfile the example is [clone clone-subpatch 16] which is > confusing, I think it should be [clone clone-abstraction 16] because > that's what it is in Pd terminology, right? (A subpatch being [pd subpatch]) > > 3. When saving a cloned abstraction that has ben opened through the > clone object it closes itself. That probably has a technical reason but > for the user experience it is a little annoying. > > But generally I really like the functionality of it. Greatly simplifies > some of my patches. I hope my feedback was helpful. > > m. > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
