How about passing messages through netsend/netreceive?
-- Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. On 4/8/2018 12:13 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: > Unfortunately, the deadlock can also happen if you send too many messages to > or from the subprocess! > > I found an article explaining the issue: > https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20110707-00/?p=10223 > > they suggest to use seperate threads for reading and writing. Others are > welcome to clone the branch and try out solutions :-) > >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 08. April 2018 um 14:10 Uhr >> Von: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> >> An: "Lucas Cordiviola" <lucard...@hotmail.com> >> Cc: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at> >> Betreff: Re: [PD] pd~ bugfixes - need some help >> >> thanks for reporting! >> >>> When you say "ignore audio API in sys_loadpreferences when an external >>> scheduler is used": >>> >>> This will still work when using an "external scheduler" ? >>> >>> It will work using Pdvst~ right? >> I'm not sure what you mean here but currently the "-schedlib" flag already >> sets the audio api to 0 in sys_argparse (which is called after >> sys_loadpreferences) so AFAICT there shouldn't be any difference anyway. >> >> >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 08. April 2018 um 04:47 Uhr >>> Von: "Lucas Cordiviola" <lucard...@hotmail.com> >>> An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at>, Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at> >>> Betreff: Re: [PD] pd~ bugfixes - need some help >>> >>> On win8.1 I get roughly the same limit of 202. >>> >>> On Ubuntu16.04 the limit is around 180. >>> >>> >>> Some question on this PR: >>> >>> When you say "ignore audio API in sys_loadpreferences when an external >>> scheduler is used": >>> >>> This will still work when using an "external scheduler" ? >>> >>> It will work using Pdvst~ right? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. >>> >>> On 4/7/2018 9:48 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: >>>> I'm working on a couple of bugfixes for pd~: >>>> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/349 >>>> >>>> I hit a wall with a bug where opening a subprocess with a large -fifo size >>>> will stall both processes (they seem to wait for each other forever). can >>>> someone confirm this issue? and if yes, on which system and at which fifo >>>> size does it happen? >>>> >>>> Christof >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
