thanks, cyrille, but why does the computation for 5pow12 [print start] in my patch then still produce 2.44141e+08? or 5pow12 - 4pow12 work? (see attached)
cheers hans
big_number_precision2.pd
Description: Binary data
> Am 26.04.2018 um 09:46 schrieb cyrille henry <c...@chnry.net>: > > hello, > > this is not a probem with until, but a problem of big number precision. > see attachment. > cheers > c > > > Le 26/04/2018 à 09:30, hans w. koch a écrit : >> dear miller, >> all >> for a project i am working with very high number of iterations. >> but it seems i´ve literally hit a ceiling with [until] >> for 4pow12 iterations it performs fine. >> but 5pow12 doesn´t. >> feeding it into a counter, 5pow12 produces the same result as 4pow12. >> attached a small patch to demonstrate. >> is this limitation by purpose? >> (i have a workaround not using [until], but wanted to make sure i didn´t >> overlook something) >> thanks >> hans >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > <big_number_precision.pd>_______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list