On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 00:02 +0200, Ingo Stock wrote: > to my knowledge it is not possible to delete a single scalar.
Thanks for the confirmation. I'm also wondering whether this will always be like this or if it would be a trivial feature to add. > The method > to get rid of a scalar is to clear the subpatch and recreate > everything. Yeah. It's not very elegant and gets expensive pretty quickly. I was wondering about alternative strategies, like moving non-used scalars out-of-the-way and later re-use them. It's cumbersome to implement, but probably less drastic than the clear-all-and-rebuild method. My goal is to build GUIs with ds that are fully functional without requiring switching into edit mode. I'd be interested in hearing about similar success (or failure) stories. Roman On 05/18/2018 11:36 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > Hey all > > > > Following up a thread from 2011: > > https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-04/088306.html > > > > I would like to know whether it is impossible to delete a specific > > scalar, by pointer. If so, why is that? Does it use a design that > > makes > > it difficult to allow this? To my untrained eye there is no > > apparent > > reason why it is possible by editing the GUI graphically/manually, > > but > > not per message. > > > > Roman > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/l > > istinfo/pd-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis > tinfo/pd-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
