that's what I was suggesting ;) 2018-05-31 9:15 GMT-03:00 Christof Ressi <[email protected]>:
> just an idea: what if [seed( without argument would take the current > system time? > > or even seed it with the system time on creation? > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2018 um 13:36 Uhr > > Von: "Peter P." <[email protected]> > > An: pd-list <[email protected]> > > Betreff: Re: [PD] Random > > > > * Marco Matteo Markidis <[email protected]> [2018-05-30 19:29]: > > > usually in random number generators one wants to have control on the > seed > > > because this allows to have the same numeric streams every time one > wants. > > > > I thought about this and conclude that the help patch should mention the > > fact that the sequence is always the same even when the object is not > > explicitely seeded with the [seed ...< message. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
