Each new instance of [random] already seeds itself differently, so adding $0 isn't going to change anything there. The problem is that the seeds are repeated when you restart PD, so you'll get the same pseudo-random results every time you open the program. $0 won't help here, because the $0 values also repeat when you restart PD. ________________________________ From: Pd-list <[email protected]> on behalf of Peter P. <[email protected]> Sent: 02 July 2018 18:26 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PD] Random
* Liam Goodacre <[email protected]> [2018-07-02 06:34]: > Perhaps using $0 might be better then as it is unique and automatically > assigned. > > But $0 itself is deterministic--the first instance is 1003, the second is > 1004, etc. Yes, but it will provide a different seed to [random] inside every abstraction. Forgive me if I understand your intentions in the wrong way- _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
