Likewise. Is there anyone opposing?
On 13.08.2018 13:23, Matt Davey wrote:
Totally agree with Dan on all points.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 12:32, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
My 2 cents:
* "subpatch" to me refers to [pd ...] aka a patch within a patch,
saved within the same patch file that uses it (no object instantiation)
* "abstraction" to me refers to a patch saved to and loaded from
it's own file (object instantiation)
* using "subpatches and abstractions" when referring to both is the
is the best option, I agree that "subwindow" is problematic since
there multiple types of things displayed in multiple windows already
(ie. the audio dialog could conceptually be a subwindow as well...)
* my preference is for "subpatch" as opposed to "sub-patch"
* "canvas" is problematic as there are already two notions of canvas
within Pd: the Pd patch canvas and the TK drawing canvas
On Aug 12, 2018, at 11:40 PM, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Message-ID: <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
I see, then maybe we are better off without umbrella term and just
refer
to subpatches and abstractions as "subpatches and abstractions".
m.
--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
